I finished reading Peter Bergen’s Manhunt: From 9/11 to
Abottabad – The Ten Year Search For Osama Bin Laden a couple of days ago, and although
the book said so much to me, I find there is not much I have to say about it. These
current affairs/general knowledge-y books are quite wasted on a person like me
who chooses to not read the news. But it
was hard to resist a book about a man who changed the course of humanity, when
it presented itself. And through the 240 pages of the book, I lost myself in
the fascinating, almost novel-like story of America’s hunt for Bin Laden after
he launched what was perhaps the most brutal terrorist attack in the history of
modern civilization.
The book takes us through Bin Laden and the American law
enforcement agencies’ long parallel paths from 2001 through 2011 until they
finally converge in Pakistan. Bergen traces the beginnings and rise of Bin
Laden and America’s, especially, the CIA’s consequent search of him. He tells how
from Somalia to Saudi to Afghanistan to Pakistan, from the Clinton to the Bush
to the Obama administration, the deft Osama gave the Americans the slip for nearly
two decades. The author recounts how the Bush administration made one expensive
error of letting Osama slip by in the mountains of Tora Bora in Afghanistan
soon after the 9/11 attacks and how it cost them hundreds of thousands of man
hours and money. He goes on the say how things changed once Obama took over and
how despite his anti-war stance, he gave it his all to find America’s number
one enemy.
Bergen sketches Osama’s life on the run too. Sourcing from
the many documents and proofs collected by the intelligence agencies, he
describes Osama’s near infallible security measures, his astute leadership
skills while in hiding and even some idiosyncrasies. He offers glimpses of his
family life, especially his relationship with his wives and children, and close
associates as well. It is easy to imagine a Bin laden holed up in the caves or
in an inconspicuous bungalow when Bergen writes about it.
While Bergen’s writing is good, he never tries to be
anything else but the journalist that he is. His lines are fact-laden,
purposeful with not one unnecessary word. You may well be reading newspaper reports
because Bergen’s words lack emotion. However, his pace more than makes up for
it, and will serve well devourers of news. As for me, I’ve said so much
already, but do you notice how I’ve not said anything (significant) at all? Well, the bottom line is 2 out of 5.
No comments:
Post a Comment